Exotic Ambrosia Beetles 2017-06-15T20:00:45+00:00

Ecology and Management of Exotic Ambrosia Beetles

Producers of nursery grown trees incur considerable risk because trees must be maintained for several years before they become salable. During this time trees are susceptible to damage from many sources including insect pests. In the past decade, North Carolina nurseries have faced increased risk of insect damage to many varieties of trees due to introduction of granulate ambrosia beetle (GAB), Xylosandrus crassiusculus, from Asia. Female GAB emerge in spring, bore into the trunks of young trees, and excavate galleries in the heartwood. In addition, female beetles inoculate trees with ambrosia fungus which blocks xylem vessels. Infested plants die from boring damage, ambrosia fungus, or infection by a secondary pathogen.

GAB are protected from insecticides once inside a tree. Therefore, the current management recommendation is to spray the bark of susceptible trees with permethrin insecticide when beetles emerge in spring and to repeat these applications until beetle activity subsides about 12 weeks later. Despite this intense insecticide regimen, growers continue to have trees damaged by GAB. This indicates the current management strategy needs refined to optimize efficacy.

Research and Management

Currently we have three projects designed to optimize GAB management by reducing plant damage and non-target effects of insecticide applications. See project descriptions below.

The overall objective of this project is to prevent economic loss by informing nursery and landscape professionals when preventative insecticide applications are necessary to protect trees from Granulate Ambrosia Beetle damage. To achieve this, a pilot monitoring and alert program will be established with three specific objectives:

  1. To monitor and collect data on Granulate Ambrosia Beetle across North Carolina;
  2. To set up an email system that will inform nursery and landscape professionals when Granulate Ambrosia Beetle is active in their region;
GAB are protected from contact insecticides once inside a tree and systemic insecticides are ineffective because they do not ingest vascular tissue. Therefore, the current management recommendation is to spray the bark of susceptible trees with a pyrethroid insecticide when beetles emerge in spring and to repeat these applications every 2-3 weeks until beetle activity subsides about 12 weeks later. Pyrethroid applications are typically made with airblast sprayers that produce a fine insecticide mist. This application method allows growers to treat a large number of trees in a short amount of time. However, only a small portion of the insecticide contacts the trees while the rest settles on the ground or elsewhere in the environment. Thus far more active ingredient is released into the environment than is required to effectively manage the pest. Increasing environmental regulations, consumer concern about pesticide use, and a slowing economy mean that growers need to apply insecticides in a more judicious and economical way.

Targeted insecticide applications are a cornerstone of IPM. Routine, broadcast applications of broad spectrum insecticides have been shown to increase scale and mite populations in ornamental trees by killing natural enemies. An alternative application methods is to apply insecticide directly to tree trunks thus reducing waste and environmental harm. This method, developed by a local grower, uses a backpack sprayer and a spray wand with 2 opposing nozzles eight inches apart. Both sides of a tree can be sprayed with a single pass down the trunk. Growers who use these methods estimate they use 90% less active ingredient compared to an airblast sprayer. The same growers also believe they get better coverage and efficacy using manual application. The trade off is that more time is required compared to airblast applications.

Applying insecticides directly to tree trunks rather than broadcasting it throughout a nursery will reduce the quantity of active ingredient released into the environment and the impact of this insecticide regimen on non-target organisms. However, adoption of more labor intensive application methods relies on demonstrating the economics and efficacy of the procedures. Therefore, the objective of this research is to compare efficacy, environmental impact, and cost associated with manual application methods to conventional airblast sprayer applications.

Objectives: In this project we will evaluate using an airblast sprayer and dual-nozzle backpack sprayer for the application of permethrin to:

  1. Evaluate the efficacy of each method by measuring insecticide coverage and incidence of GAB damage
  2. Evaluate the environmental impact of each method by measuring active ingredient released, insecticide residue on unintended surfaces, and effect on beneficial arthropods
  3. Evaluate the economic cost of each method by measuring product, labor, and plant damage expenses

See new paper here

Current management recommendation is to spray the bark of susceptible trees with permethrin insecticide when beetles emerge in spring and to repeat these applications every 1-3 weeks until beetle activity subsides about 12 weeks later. Despite this intense insecticide regimen, growers continue to have trees damaged by GAB. This indicates the current management strategy needs refined to optimize efficacy. One way current management could be optimized is to determine exactly how long permenthrin applications are effective and under what conditions.

There are many inconsistencies in how growers apply permethrin to susceptible trees. Growers vary in frequency of application from 1 to 3 weeks. It is likely that residual efficacy ceases before another application is made. In addition, some growers use spreader-sticker products to try and increase the amount of product that adheres to tree bark and the duration of efficacy. Thus, under some treatment regimens growers are leaving trees unprotected for a period of time between applications if permethrin becomes inactive or does not adhere to bark. In other cases growers may make more applications than are necessary to effectively protect trees. Unfortunately no research is available to help growers determine how to achieve maximum efficacy with minimum input. Therefore, it is essential to document the duration of permethrin efficacy applied at different intervals with and without a spreader-sticker additive.

The overall objective of this project is to prevent economic loss by optimizing efficacy of insecticide applications to protect trees from Granulate Ambrosia Beetle (GAB) attack.

To achieve this, an experiment will be conducted in two North Carolina nurseries to determine:

  1. The frequency of permethrin application that maximizes efficacy;
  2. If spreader-sticker additives increase the level or duration of permethrin efficacy.

Gallery

Examples of young trees with evidence of ambrosia beetles boring their galleries into the trunk.

Evidence of ambrosia beetles boring into the trunk. Photo by Jiri Hulcr.

Ambrosia beetle attacks on kousa dogwood. Photo: SD Frank

Project Publications

Ranger, C.M., Schultz, P.B., Reding, M.E., Frank, S.D., Palmquist, D.E. (2016)  Flood stress as a technique to assess preventive insecticide and fungicide treatments for protecting trees against ambrosia beetles. Insects, 7(3): 40.

Frank, S.D., Ranger, C.M. (2016) Developing a media moisture threshold for nurseries to reduce tree stress and ambrosia beetle attacks. Environmental Entomology, 1-9.

Ranger, C.M., Reding, M., Schultz, P., Oliver, J., Frank, S.D., Addesso, K., Chong, J.H., Sampson, B., Werle, C. Gill, S., Krause, C. (2016) Biology, ecology, and management of nonnative ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in ornamental nurseries. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 7(1): 9; 1–23.

Ranger, C.M., Schultz, P.B., Frank, S.D., Chong, J.H., Reding, M.E. (2015) Non-native ambrosia beetles as opportunistic exploiters of living but weakened trees. PLoS ONE, 10(7): e0131496.

Frank, S.D. and Sadof, C.S. (2011) Reducing insecticide volume and non-target effects of ambrosia beetle management in nurseries. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104(6): 1960-1968.

Recent Posts

Recent Ambrosia Beetle posts from the ECOIPM Blog

Warm days likely bring ambrosia beetle attacks

Frass tooth-pick from adult ambrosia beetles boring into trees. Photo: SD Frank With several days of warm weather be on the look out [...]

New paper: Media moisture thresholds for ambrosia beetle IPM

Ambrosia beetles are among the most damaging pests of nursery. The main culprits are granulate ambrosia beetle (Xylosandrus crassiusculus) and the black stem borer (X. [...]

Ambrosia beetle attacks on landscape trees

Frass toothpicks and sawdust collected in the crotch of a crape myrtle tree. Photo: SD Frank Granulate ambrosia beetles are primary pests of [...]

New ambrosia beetle paper published

Frass tubes made by granulate ambrosia beetle. Photo by Laura Lazarus, North Carolina Division of Forest Resources, Bugwood.org Check out our new paper published [...]

Ambrosia beetle traps are filling up

The granulate ambrosia beetle, Xylosandrus crassiusculus, is the primary ambrosia beetle pest of nurseries in the Southeast. Today we found a similar ambrosia beetle species [...]

New ambrosia beetle marching across the US

Scopes-eye view of camphore shot borer fresh from a trap mixed in with granulate and other ambrosia beetle species. Photo: Andrew Ernst, NCSU. [...]